An alternative to Transformers for language modeling
The Transformer architecture has been a major component in the success of Large Language Models (LLMs). It has been used for nearly all LLMs that are being used today, from open-source models like Mistral to closed-source models like ChatGPT.
To further improve LLMs, new architectures are developed that might even outperform the Transformer architecture. One of these methods is Mamba, a State Space Model.
Mamba was proposed in the paper Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. You can find its official implementation and model checkpoints in its repository.
In this post, I will introduce the field of State Space Models in the context of language modeling and explore concepts one by one to develop an intuition about the field. Then, we will cover how Mamba might challenge the Transformers architecture.
As a visual guide, expect many visualizations to develop an intuition about Mamba and State Space Models!
To illustrate why Mamba is such an interesting architecture, let’s do a short re-cap of transformers first and explore one of its disadvantages.
A Transformer sees any textual input as a sequence that consists of tokens.
A major benefit of Transformers is that whatever input it receives, it can look back at any of the earlier tokens in the sequence to derive its representation.
Remember that a Transformer consists of two structures, a set of encoder blocks for representing text and a set of decoder blocks for generating text. Together, these structures can be used for several tasks, including translation.
